Lintel logoLintel
CSI 03 10 00

03 10 00 Concrete Forming and Accessories: Common Contradictions and RFI Guide

Formwork design requirements in the spec often conflict with structural drawing notes on removal timing and loading.

Most Concrete Forming and Accessories contradictions trace to the same root: the specification and the drawings are produced by different people at different stages, and never fully reconciled before the set goes out. By the time the conflict is found in the field, it is an RFI, a delay, or a change order.

Lintel cross-references section 03 10 00 against your full drawing set, schedules, and the rest of the project manual, flagging every disagreement with a citation to the exact page so it is resolved in review.

What goes wrong

Common contradiction types

Formwork removal schedule conflicts

A frequent concrete forming and accessories conflict. Lintel reconciles the drawings against the spec to surface it with a page-level citation, so it is caught in review rather than at rough-in.

Shore loading spec vs. structural requirements

A frequent concrete forming and accessories conflict. Lintel reconciles the drawings against the spec to surface it with a page-level citation, so it is caught in review rather than at rough-in.

Embedded item conflicts

A frequent concrete forming and accessories conflict. Lintel reconciles the drawings against the spec to surface it with a page-level citation, so it is caught in review rather than at rough-in.

In the field

Frequent RFIs

  • Formwork removal timing not matching structural requirements
  • Reshoring requirements missing from spec
  • Embedded anchor conflicts between structural and architectural
Coordinate

Related spec sections

Lintel scans your full document set for contradictions in Concrete Forming and Accessories and every other division, before the field finds them.