Lintel logoLintel
CSI 06 40 00

06 40 00 Architectural Woodwork: Common Contradictions and RFI Guide

Millwork specs conflict with architectural elevations on profile, material, and finish requirements.

Most Architectural Woodwork contradictions trace to the same root: the specification and the drawings are produced by different people at different stages, and never fully reconciled before the set goes out. By the time the conflict is found in the field, it is an RFI, a delay, or a change order.

Lintel cross-references section 06 40 00 against your full drawing set, schedules, and the rest of the project manual, flagging every disagreement with a citation to the exact page so it is resolved in review.

What goes wrong

Common contradiction types

Profile vs. architectural elevation

A frequent architectural woodwork conflict. Lintel reconciles the drawings against the spec to surface it with a page-level citation, so it is caught in review rather than at rough-in.

Material spec conflicts

A frequent architectural woodwork conflict. Lintel reconciles the drawings against the spec to surface it with a page-level citation, so it is caught in review rather than at rough-in.

Finish requirement gaps

A frequent architectural woodwork conflict. Lintel reconciles the drawings against the spec to surface it with a page-level citation, so it is caught in review rather than at rough-in.

In the field

Frequent RFIs

  • Millwork profile not matching architectural elevation
  • Material specification conflict between spec and elevation
  • Finish requirement not specified on elevation
Coordinate

Related spec sections

Lintel scans your full document set for contradictions in Architectural Woodwork and every other division, before the field finds them.